Read: 1 Corinthians 14:1-13, Acts 2:1-47, 10:44-48, 19:1-7
Some maintain the gift of tongues is proof a believer is spirit-filled. How does Acts 2 refute this claim?
Given that tongues is only mentioned in 1 Corinthians and the Book of Acts, what can be inferred?
Why would tongues have been more of a transitional gift? (i.e. like miracles) How does this adjust you?
No comments:
Post a Comment